Thailand’s Casino-Entertainment Complex Bill Stalls Amid Fierce Opposition and Political Uncertainty

Thailand’s contentious proposal to legalize casino-entertainment complexes appears to be facing an increasingly uphill battle in parliament, despite the ruling Pheu Thai Party’s backing. The legislation, initially introduced as part of an economic revitalization strategy, has now been postponed for consideration until the next parliamentary session beginning July 2nd, following widespread resistance and signs of deepening political discord.

The Pheu Thai-led government has recently stepped back from efforts to accelerate the bill’s passage, a move interpreted by many as an admission of mounting obstacles. As reported by the Bangkok Post, political observers believe the delay highlights more than just scheduling issues. Political analyst Stithorn Thananithichot of King Prajadhipok’s Institute commented, “The government cannot keep postponing deliberation indefinitely.” He added that “a referendum would be the only viable solution if the government wishes to proceed amid ongoing opposition.”

A major blow to the legislation came when Chaichanok Chidchob, secretary-general of the coalition’s Bhumjaithai Party, voiced direct opposition to the bill in parliament. In response, Interior Minister and Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul attempted to downplay speculation of a rift within the party and the coalition as a whole.

Concerns from critics have centered on moral, legal, and constitutional grounds. Some have even gone as far as threatening mass protests, warning that advancing the casino bill could destabilize the government. These anxieties are compounded by fears that the proposed entertainment complexes could bring a host of social problems alongside economic development.

Bhumjaithai’s influence in Buri Ram province and its reputed ties with members of the Senate further complicate the bill’s path. With the Senate consisting of 200 members—many believed to be sympathetic to Bhumjaithai’s stance—the chances of securing adequate support appear slim.

Former Democrat MP Thepthai Senpong stressed the breadth of opposition, saying it transcends political affiliations. “Concerns center largely on moral and ethical issues,” he said, highlighting how even non-political organizations have joined the resistance. Among these are the Academy of Moral and Political Science at the Royal Society of Thailand and the Catholic Education Council, both of which have publicly condemned the bill.

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra clarified that the bill has not been entirely withdrawn. Instead, the government will continue to engage the public and collect feedback. A Senate committee has been established to examine the proposal, with its findings expected within 180 days.

Still, the window for action may be closing. “Without a referendum, it is unlikely the entertainment complex project will materialize during the government’s remaining two years in office,” Stithorn stated. He added that Pheu Thai likely recognizes the political risks of pushing ahead, noting that the backlash could “potentially threaten the government’s survival.”

In Thepthai’s view, the casino project may resurface as part of Pheu Thai’s manifesto for the next general election. He pointed out that the policy had not been included in the party’s 2023 platform, leaving it vulnerable to criticism over a perceived lack of mandate.

However, not all analysts agree on the bill’s fate. Olarn Thinbangtieo, a political science lecturer at Burapha University, expressed optimism for its eventual passage. “Pheu Thai can negotiate with coalition partners who are reluctant to break away from the government,” he said. Even if the legislation’s approval were to trigger a premature end to the current administration, Olarn believes the party could recover politically. “Pheu Thai could rely on handout pledges to regain voter support in future elections,” he told the Bangkok Post.

By fLEXI tEAM